<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com">
<title>Complementary Health Practice Review current issue</title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Complementary Health Practice Review RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>January 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Complementary Health Practice Review</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1533-2101</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/36?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/1/51?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://chp.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Complementary Health Practice Review</title>
<url>http://chp.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Envisioning a Future Contemplative Science of Mindfulness: Fruitful Methods and New Content for the Next Wave of Research]]></title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Mindfulness is an ancient spiritual practice as well as a unique behavioral technique involving the cultivation of non-judgmental, non-reactive, metacognitive awareness of present-moment experience. Given the growing interest in mindfulness across numerous academic and clinical disciplines, an agenda is needed to guide the next wave of research. Here, we suggest four areas that, in our view, are important for a future contemplative science of mindfulness: performance-based measures of mindfulness, scientific evaluation of Buddhist claims, neurophenomenology of mindfulness, and measuring changes in mindfulness-induced gene expression. By exploring these domains, the wisdom of the meditative traditions may be complemented by leading-edge empirical research methodologies.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garland, E., Gaylord, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1533210109333718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Envisioning a Future Contemplative Science of Mindfulness: Fruitful Methods and New Content for the Next Wave of Research]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mindfulness Research Update: 2008]]></title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Objective: To briefly review the effects of mindfulness on the mind, the brain, the body, and behavior. Methods: Selective review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases (2003&mdash;2008) using the terms ``mindfulness,'' ``meditation,'' ``mental health,'' ``physical health,'' ``quality of life,'' and ``stress reduction.'' A total of 52 exemplars of empirical and theoretical work were selected for review. Results: Both basic and clinical research indicate that cultivating a more mindful way of being is associated with less emotional distress, more positive states of mind, and better quality of life. In addition, mindfulness practice can influence the brain, the autonomic nervous system, stress hormones, the immune system, and health behaviors, including eating, sleeping, and substance use, in salutary ways. Conclusion: The application of cutting-edge technology toward understanding mindfulness&mdash; an ``inner technology''&mdash;is elucidating new ways in which attention, awareness, acceptance, and compassion may promote optimal health&mdash;in mind, body, relationships, and spirit.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greeson, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1533210108329862</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mindfulness Research Update: 2008]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Tong Ren Healing Method: A Survey Study]]></title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tong Ren (TR) is an untested energy healing modality with anecdotally-reported effectiveness for a variety of disorders. Study objective: To describe participant reports of effectiveness and safety. Design: Cross-sectional, anonymous survey. Setting: Weekly group sessions in the Northeast US. Participants: Adults attending group sessions. Measures: Changes in conditions attributed to TR. Results: Response rate 89% (n = 265). Cancer (30.6%), endocrine/autoimmune (17.5%) and musculoskeletal disorders (17.2%) were the most commonly reported conditions. Among respondents who had attended more than one session (n = 216), 30% used superlatives (e.g., ``amazing'') to describe TR's impact, and one-third noted improved quality of life. No adverse effects were described. Anxiety, depression, cancer, and autoimmune disorders appeared to have the greatest treatment responses, with 63.8%, 61.0%, 60.3%, and 58.1% of participants with these conditions reporting substantial improvements. Conclusion: This first study documenting self-reported effects of TR shows subjective benefits and no adverse effects. Further research on this approach is warranted.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sullivan, A. M., Bauer-Wu, S., Miovic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1533210108329265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Tong Ren Healing Method: A Survey Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/36?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chiropractors and Vaccinations: Ethics is the Real Issue]]></title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/36?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article traces the historical and philosophical roots of the provaccination and anti-vaccination movements through to the present day, with a focus on the role of chiropractic within those movements. Political, legal, and scientific issues are considered. Attempts to portray the anti-vaccination chiropractors as unscientific extremists, by both orthodox medicine and from within the chiropractic community itself, clouds the informed consent and freedom of choice aspect relating to health care that they espouse, and scapegoats the so-called extremists rather than facing the ethical issues surrounding fully informed consent. The authors conclude that would-be medical ethicists promote their own political agendas that aid profit before safety and breed distrust within the community that is meant to be served in a balanced and ethical manner.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vernon, L. F., Kent, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1533210109333771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chiropractors and Vaccinations: Ethics is the Real Issue]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/1/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research Into Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Personal Comment]]></title>
<link>http://chp.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/1/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernst, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1533210109332392</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research Into Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Personal Comment]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>14</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>