This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stone, W. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Physical Activity and Health: Becoming Mainstream

Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University East, 7001 E. Williams Field Rd., CLRB Bldg, Mesa, AZ 85212

Complementary health practices and physical activity share some common origins. In the early stages of development, neither was widely practiced or recognized as a valuable contributor to health. Systematic research on physical activity and health began in the 1950s, focusing on occupational exertion. That work was criticized as methodologically flawed, leading in time to more controlled research, longitudinal studies, and the adoption of an exercise epidemiology model. In 1996, the Surgeon General’s Report on Physical Activity and Health clearly documented that physical activity reduced morbidity and mortality. Physical activity had become part of mainstream health and medicine. In 2002, the White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy suggested ways of strengthening the growing body of evidence that supports a number of complementary health practices. With improved methodology, complementary health practices researchers can provide stronger documentation of the beneficial impact of those practices on health.

Key Words: physical activity • health • complementary health practices • mainstream

Complementary Health Practice Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 118-128 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1076167503254905


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?