SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Complementary Health Practice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Capitol Hill

S. Elizabeth Clay

Congress, in coordination with the public, has been the driving force behind improving research, regulation, and access to complementary and alternative therapies. While government agencies have remained reluctant to move forward in conducting research in some areas of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), at times displaying a bias against them, many in Congress have been open- minded and active in asking for more research in these areas and in wanting to make CAM therapies more accessible. Numerous surveys indicate a steady increase in the use and acceptance of these therapies and the "grass roots" participation in CAM- related legislation is very strong. Congress mandated the creation of the Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM) in 1992 with an original budget of just $2 million. In 1998, in a desire to give the OAM more control of its research portfolio, Congress included in the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Omnibus Bill language to elevate the OAM to Center status (National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine) with a $50 million budget. Dr. Stephen E. Straus has recently been named as the new director of NCCAM. Several people on Capitol Hill have been very supportive of CAM issues. Most notable are Congressman Dan Burton, Senator Tom Harkin, Senator Orrin Hatch, and Congressman Peter Defazio. CAM issues are typically nonpartisan. In the last year, the Government Reform Committee has conducted a series of hearings looking at the role of CAM in the US health care system as well as issues in research, regulation, and access. One recent advance that comes as a result of this investigation is the announcement of the Health Care Financing Administration that the Dean Ornish Multisite Lifestyle Modification Program for Heart Disease will be accepted as a demonstration program with Medicare. The Department of Defense is also developing this program as a result of appropriations language in FY 1999. Several CAM-related bills have been introduced in the 106th Congress. Con gress remains a key component in ensuring increased research focus and funding, better regulation, and improved access to CAM treatment options for all Americans.

Complementary Health Practice Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, 233-238 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/153321019900500307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement