This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cameron, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

When Research Goes Pear-Shaped: Report and Reflections on a Failed Study of Exercise and Manual Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis

School of HMRP, Victoria University, P.O. Box 14428, Melbourne MC, 8001, Australia, Melainie.Cameron{at}vu.edu.au

Research projects collapse for a variety of reasons: for example, recruitment problems, sloppy designs, low power, or poor data management. This confessional tale reports on a failed study of the use of exercise and manual therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, solidly established in a quantitative paradigm. This research was an attempt to investigate whether adding a course of manual therapy or water exercise to existing care regimens influenced quality-of-life domains such as mobility, dexterity, and pain in people with rheumatoid arthritis. The study collapsed. The author reports her reflections on the research process and what happens to researchers and participants when studies go awry. This case addresses issues of the personal investments of the researcher, the ethical treatment of participants, the anxieties and pressures of completing a PhD, and the lack of visibility of studies with nonsignificant findings.

Key Words: rheumatoid arthritis • manual therapy • confessional • quantitative • qualitative

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?