SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Complementary Health Practice Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Complementary and Alternative Medical Reference Software for Personal Digital Assistants: Evidence of Clinical Applicability

Jonathan E. Fischer, MD

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Prospect Hill Community Health Center, 140 Main St., Prospect Hill, NC 27314 Jonathan_Fischer{at}med.unc.edu

Karen Crowell, MLIS, AHIP

Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Peter Curtis, MD

Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

To assess the quality and clinical applicability of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) software databases for personal digital assistants (PDAs), a standard challenge of 52 CAM clinical questions was developed. Benchmark answers were identified from standard texts. Aphysician evaluator then used each of 11 PDACAMsoftware programs to answer the challenge questions and assessed the programs for comprehensiveness, accuracy, and ease of use. Breadth of coverage of the challenge questions ranged from 23% to 87% and clinical reliability from 58% to 97%. The two most clearly useful products were the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database and the Natural Standard. None of the programs covered combination substances, and only the Natural Standard provided some information on therapeutic modalities other than the herbal and supplement aspects of CAM. The use of a standard clinical challenge as an evaluation tool may be a good way to assess reference software in this clinical area.

Key Words: handheld computers • complementary and alternative medicine databases • evaluation studies • information storage and retrieval • herbal medicine

Complementary Health Practice Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 57-72 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1533210104273020


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
K. A Clauson, H. H Polen, A. S Peak, W. A Marsh, and S. L DiScala
Clinical Decision Support Tools: Personal Digital Assistant versus Online Dietary Supplement Databases
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2008; 42(11): 1592 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement